- Muni market rebounds in second quarter
- Tax policy boosts muni demand, particularly among high-tax states
- State budget pressures may pose challenges for munis
In a trend that emerged in April, investors returned to asset classes they abandoned early in the pandemic.
In July, many fixed-income sectors continued to rebound, including municipal bonds. After losing ground in March and April, the BBG Barclays Municipal Bond Index has risen to a positive 3.80% return for the year through July 31, 2020. Yields on municipal bonds have fallen to levels not seen in decades.
Among mutual fund investors, demand rebounded after April. Net new cash flow into municipal bond funds turned positive in May and has persisted throughout the summer. For example, net flows totaled nearly $3 billion each week for the past five weeks alone. (ICI, August 19, 2020).
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act boosts demand
Investors seeking tax-exempt income typically include municipal bond funds in their fixed-income allocation. Unlike Treasuries or corporate bonds, the interest earned on municipal bonds is free from federal and, in some cases, state and local income taxes. The tax-free status can be an advantage for investors who may be subject to high personal income taxes.
Demand for munis has been solid since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 set a cap on state and local tax deductions (SALT). With that change in the law, many taxpayers have not been able to itemize deductions, making them consider other strategies for reducing the bite of income taxes. Because municipal bonds are exempt from federal income taxes, retail demand for them has increased. In particular, individual investors in high-tax states like New York and California have used munis to try to mitigate their tax liability.
How income opportunities have changed in 2020
Historically, municipal bonds have offered attractive opportunities for after-tax income relative to taxable sectors such as government or corporate bonds. This might not have been clear to investors who focused on yields, because muni yields were often relatively low. Tax exemption provided the difference.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused a large shift in the fixed-income market. Initially, corporate and municipal bonds sold off while Treasuries rallied, which widened yield spreads.
Amid the turmoil, the Federal Reserve took unprecedented action to support funding markets with a series of facilities and programs. In April, the Fed authorized the Municipal Liquidity Facility (MLF) to provide aid to state and local governments struggling with the economic impact from the pandemic lockdowns. Recognizing the potential for significant future revenue declines, the Fed quickly expanded and extended the duration of the program. In addition, Congress stepped in with fiscal support, passing a pandemic relief package with $484 billion to aid small businesses and hospitals.
These actions boosted investor confidence in the municipal bond sector. As the economy slowly re-opened, investors poured cash into muni bonds. Supply remained low, which supported bond prices.
In this context, the Fed also quickly slashed short-term interest rates. As a result, the interest offered by certificates of deposit (CDs) plunged.
By June 30, the shift in the fixed-income landscape showed much lower income opportunities for CDs and Treasuries. While municipal bond yields are also lower this year, their after-tax income advantage remains compelling.
States under budget pressure
Business closures and stay-at-home restrictions that went into effect in many states during March and lasting into May and June, in some cases, reduced state revenues from sales, business, and income taxes, as well as other fees. States and municipalities received short-term help from Fed programs, but the longer term budget effects are still unfolding. Research from the Tax Foundation estimates a $121 billion decline in expected state tax receipts for the current and coming fiscal years. Fortunately, state and local finances were in relatively solid condition entering 2020 after a decade-long economic expansion. Historically, the default rate of the muni market has been low, averaging less than 1%, during economic recessions and expansions.
Some challenges persist
The economic recovery is tied to the pandemic’s trajectory. Certainly the coronavirus is better understood today than in March. Researchers are working across the globe to identify improved therapeutics and vaccines. These advances will likely influence policy and fiscal decision making going forward. State and local governments will likely turn to reserves to offset revenue declines due to the weakened economy. At the same time, local governments have flexibility to take additional actions to shore up budget shortfalls such as cutting expenses, increase borrowing, accessing the Fed’s MLF, or raising revenue through taxation.
Understanding the muni bond advantage
To find attractive after-tax income opportunities, explore muni yields across states.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.