- Potential future higher tax rates could boost demand for munis
- Increasing federal deficit and mandatory spending weigh on budget
- Taxes are in focus in November election
The possibility of higher taxes in the future could boost demand for tax-advantaged investments.
Rising federal budget deficits are likely to compel lawmakers to find revenue sources or risk rising interest rates. This pressure, combined with the expiration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) in 2025 pose planning challenges for taxpayers. If no legislative changes are made by the time the TCJA sunsets, tax rates will revert back to 2017 levels, resulting in increases. Tax code changes could be made earlier, depending on the 2020 election.
At some point, revenue needs could push lawmakers to increase tax rates or impose new taxes. In response, municipal bond funds may grow in popularity.
Below, we’ll look at what’s driving the federal budget situation, then turn to some of the tax and revenue proposals of the 2020 candidates that might be debated in coming years.
The deficit could quadruple
Tax increases may be one way to try to offset the soaring federal deficit.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected in April that the federal deficit will reach $3.3 trillion in fiscal year 2020 and $2.1 trillion next year. With the expected weakness in economic growth, the deficit would represent 17.9% of GDP in 2020 and 9.8% of GDP in 2021, compared with 4.6% in 2019.
The CBO had revised its earlier March outlook for the deficit relative to GDP, raising its projection 13 percentage points for 2020 and about 5 percentage points for 2021.
Multiple forces are at work. The cost of federal mandatory programs is rising as the population ages and health-care costs continue to escalate. This year, the pandemic has strained federal revenues while emergency relief packages, including the CARES Act, have pushed up spending. As GDP contracted at an unprecedented pace in the second quarter and over 20 million jobs were lost, state and federal tax receipts plummeted.
At the same time, it’s important to keep in mind that a recovering economy and progress on vaccines for COVID-19 could help lift economic growth rates and tax revenues in 2021 and 2022.
Demand for tax-advantaged munis already rising
The interest earned on municipal bonds is free from federal and, in some cases, state and local income taxes.
Municipal bonds become more attractive on a relative basis for taxpayers who may be subject to the 3.8% surtax on investment income and who may also be subject to the highest marginal tax rate. Amid economic weakness and investor risk aversion this year, the yields of taxable investment-grade bonds have fallen to low levels, making municipal bonds even more competitive.
Demand for munis has also been solid since the TCJA set a cap on state and local tax deductions (SALT). With that change in the law, many taxpayers have not been able to itemize deductions, making them consider other strategies for reducing taxable income. Because municipal bonds are exempt from federal income taxes, retail demand has increased. Individual investors in high-tax states like New York and California have used munis to try to mitigate their tax liability.
Tax proposals for debate in 2020 and beyond
Here are some of the highlights put together by the Tax Foundation of the tax proposals from the Republican and Democratic candidates for president (Source: Tax Foundation, as of August 25, 2020):
President Donald Trump
Taxes on personal income
An unspecified tax cut to boost take-home pay
Other tax proposals
- “Made in America” tax credit
- Expanded “opportunity zone” program
- Potential reduction in capital gains tax rate
- Tax credit for companies to bring back jobs from China
- Allow 100% expensing for certain industries that bring manufacturing back to the United States
Democratic-nominee Joe Biden
Taxes on personal income
- For taxpayers with over $400,000 in annual income, repeal the TCJA income-tax-rate reductions and restore the top marginal income tax rate to 39.6%
- Also for those earning over $400,000, phase out the Section 199A deduction (business deduction for pass-through entities)
- Cap the value of itemized deductions to 28% for those in higher marginal tax brackets and restore the Pease limitation on itemized deductions for those with taxable income above $400,000
- Impose the 12.4% Social Security payroll tax on wage and self-employment income earned above $400,000
Other tax proposals
- For those earning over $1 million, set the tax rate on capital gains at ordinary income tax rates (up from the current top rate of 23.8%)
- Eliminate step-up in cost basis for inherited assets with capital gains, instead taxing those gains at death
- Raise the corporate income tax to 28% from 21%
- Impose a 15% minimum book tax (income prior to taxes) on corporations with $100 million or greater in income
- Double the tax rate on Global Intangible Low Tax Income (GILTI) earned by foreign subsidiaries of U.S. firms, to 21% from 10.5%
Evaluate yields on a tax-equivalent basis
Compare municipal funds on equal footing with taxable bond funds.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.