- We still have a bearish view on oil prices at the end of March.
- Physical markets for oil should be better than expected in coming months.
- We expect oil prices to enter a correction stage and for Russia’s war in Ukraine to play less of a role in oil markets.
March was a wild month, even by the standards of the volatile oil market. We have seen $35 swings, peaks at $130, and a bottom at $93. More recently, it is trading in the $110s after a rally.
We view these price moves not as a reflection of physical markets, but as a sign of shifts in expectations and related financial positioning. The causes of the price swings are the Russia-Ukraine War, a possible EU ban on Russian oil, and big supply disruptions, with Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) pipeline deliveries expected to be down about 0.6 million barrels per day (mbpd) over the next six weeks. At some point, spot prices will likely converge to the realities of the physical markets. This makes the key question the outlook for physical markets.
We still have a bearish view at current levels, on the belief physical markets will be better than expected in coming months, and oil prices will enter a correction stage. The major risk and biggest uncertainty in this view is Russian exports. In our estimation, buyers will show up and the final impact will be limited.
Price expectations based on current tanker tracking numbers are misleading, we believe, since they reflect pre-war orders. We will have better information in the second half of April.
Spot prices for WTI* crude oil are well above projected fair value scenarios
*West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil.
Sources: Bloomberg, U.S. Energy Information Administration, and Putnam Investments, calculations as of March 29, 2022.
Demand for Russian oil is strong in Asia
So far in March, Russia crude oil exports are the highest since 2019, at close to 5 mbpd. (Kpler and TankerTrackers.com). They export an additional 2 mbpd to 2.5 mbpd products, with half of this being gasoil. However, these contracts were made before the invasion. We will start to see the effects of the war in the second half of April. The International Energy Agency (IEA) is estimating a 3 mbpd loss (–28%) in Russia’s production, but we expect it will be a smaller drop. We also believe an EU ban, which is the market’s biggest concern, is unlikely so long as Germans oppose it. Germany should be brave enough to accept recession risks.
The current discount on Urals oil would translate into $17 million in profit per 1 million barrels (an average tanker), even including current super-expensive shipping costs. We believe this is a lifetime opportunity, and we do not underestimate the profit incentive of traders, especially ones in Asia where reputational risks from profiting on the war are not that high. In particular, the Indians and Chinese are having some difficulties finding shippers, but they are coming back to market. We are already seeing buyers from India and China:†
- Hindustan Petroleum Corp. recently bought 2 million barrels of the Urals grade for delivery in June, and other Indian refiners are also seeking cargoes.
- Indian Oil Corp. (IOC) bought 3 million barrels of Urals oil for May loading.
- Several Chinese state-owned refiners also have returned to the spot market to buy Urals oil for May loading.
- Sinopec and PetroChina are looking for barrels for June loadings.
- Independent, or teapot, refiners also have started taking Urals oil, but quietly, to avoid public attention.
- Teapots are also reemerging in the far eastern spot market for Russian ESPO (Eastern Siberia Pacific Ocean) oil.
†Sources: Reuters, Bloomberg, S&P Global.
Many forces could weaken oil demand and increase supply
Now the key risk is the duration of the war, in our view. Considering Russia’s current losses, it cannot continue the same offensive for a long time. One way or another, we will see an end to the war. The worst path would be nuclear war. It is a tail risk, but it is rising, unfortunately, and remains difficult to price into the market scenarios.
Below are additional supply and demand considerations.
- Iran: According to the sources (Axios news), Russia received the guarantees it was seeking that sanctions would not block its trade with Iran. However, the leaks from the teams sound increasingly pessimistic about chances of a new Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Chances are lower than last month, down to 50-50.(Energy Intelligence Group.
- China lockdowns: Cities across China with a combined population of close to 200 million are now under some form of Covid-related lockdown, which will have negative impacts on crude oil demand. (Argus).
- U.S.: The Dallas Fed Energy Survey shows oil production increased at a faster pace, according to executives at exploration and production firms. The oil production index jumped from 19.1 in the fourth quarter of 2021 to 45.0 in the first quarter of 2022. U.S. oil product demand is slowing after a temporary spike due to colder than normal winter months.
- Trading views: Our unchanged view is that one way or another, the Ukraine situation will reach an equilibrium. Nuclear conflict remains a small but growing tail risk. However, shipping problems are likely short term. At current levels, the risk premium in oil is excessive in the medium to long term. Corrections to under/overshooting could be very sharp and quick in the oil market.
Lower oil prices could ease inflation pressure
If oil enters a correction stage in line with our bearish views, it will be positive for inflation risks and risky assets. Oil above $90 is usually seen as demand destructive and stagflationary. Lower oil prices could remove the upside risks in headline inflation, and we could see peak inflation soon. The reaction of households and firms to oil prices is nonlinear. They typically respond to extremely high oil prices via lower consumption and production. Therefore, lower oil prices could mitigate these growth risks and could support risky assets.
For informational purposes only. Not an investment recommendation.
This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, or any Putnam product or strategy. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. Putnam Investments cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Putnam assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or ensure against loss. It is possible to lose money in a diversified portfolio.
Consider these risks before investing: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Investments in small and/or midsize companies increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk, which means the prices of the fund’s bond investments are likely to fall if interest rates rise. Bond investments also are subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the bond may default on payment of interest or principal. Interest-rate risk is generally greater for longer-term bonds, and credit risk is generally greater for below-investment-grade bonds, which may be considered speculative. Unlike bonds, funds that invest in bonds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. Commodities involve the risks of changes in market, political, regulatory, and natural conditions. You can lose money by investing in a mutual fund.
Putnam Retail Management.